The First Crusaders were not justified in capturing Jerusalem following the defense of Constantinople. After Byzantine defeats against the Seljuq Turks, Pope Gregory VII called for a crusade to aid their Orthodox Christian brothers. This call was ignored. 20 years later, Byzantine emperor Alexios asked Pope Urban II for aid against the Turkish, and once again the Pope responded in favor, calling for aid to the Byzantines: “This royal city, however, situated at the center of the earth, is now held captive by the enemies of Christ and is subjected, by those who do not know God, to the worship the heathen. She seeks, therefore, and desires to be liberated and ceases not to implore you to come to her aid” (Expedition to Jerusalem, Book 1). This time, however, the Popes words had more impact. The armies sent out were unprofessional and undisciplined. They sacked and pillaged as they moved toward Constantinople, killing Jews and laying Eastern Europe to waste. Once they arrived in Constantinople, Alexios saw the destruction they had caused and wished only to use the knights as a tool to defend his empire. He transported them to Asia Minor and allowed them to continue taking back territory after repelling the Turks.
I believe that following defense of Constantinople, the crusaders returned to their original goal: gaining wealth. The people leading the crusade were some of the most powerful nobles throughout Europe. They had a lot of money and a lot of it to risk by embarking on this crusade. Why would they do that? It is not simply out of kindness for their fellow Christian, but to take wealth from the Muslim Empire and establish Christian footholds throughout the Middle East. At the end of the crusade, “those who were poor there, her God makes rich. Those who had few coins, here possess countless besants” (Expedition to Jerusalem, Book III). Essentially, those who had gone to crusade became extremely wealthy and rich.
It should be clear now that the Crusades were simply an excuse for European nobles to take land from the Muslim Empire. Were they justified? According to their own beliefs with God, they were not. They claimed they were conquering the holy land in the name of God, but that is a lie they were told and that they told themselves. They say they did it to defend Christianity, but it was really to make money. ‘Justification’ of our actions is a very relative term. According to our values, ones that promote peace and dissuade conflict in the name of greed, the Crusaders were not justified. According to their values, defending fellow Christians and approval by God, the Crusaders were still not justified. No one has claim to land or wealth, people will take what they want: “The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must”.
WC:475
Fulcher of Chartres. A History of the Expedition to Jerusalem, 1095-1127. Trans. Frances Rita Ryan. Ed. Harold S. Fink. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., 1969


You must be logged in to post a comment.